When Is A “Vaccine” Not A Vaccine?

What Is It–Really?

I am really tired of the COVID vaccine hype. Webster defines a “vaccine” as a preparation developed and “administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease.” “Immunity” is defined as “a condition of being able or the capacity to resist a particular disease especially through preventing development of a pathogenic microorganism or by counteracting the effects of its products.”

§ If these COVID serums do not provide the resistance to acquiring or transmitting a disease implied by the definitions, then why do the CDC and other autocratic fear mongers insist on calling them “vaccines.” It seems a more appropriate designation would be “injectable therapeutic.” Of course, “injectable therapeutic” would not serve the political COVID fear campaign.

(Added 1/30/2022)
After viewing Senator Ron Johnson’s “A Second Opinion” presentation from doctors and researchers, I have a much better understanding of what the mRNA “vaccine” really is. From one of the research presenters, I learned the “vaccines” induce the production of spike proteins, which in turn induces antibodies that attack spike proteins. Spike proteins are one of the mechanisms by which COV-Sars2 infect humans. From one of the doctors, I learned that rather than being termed “vaccines,” the injections should be called “genetic therapeutics.”

A Moving Target

§ Once upon a time, “fully vaccinated” meant two separate injections of the Pfizer or Moderna, or one of the Johnson & Johnson serums. Now, First Minister Fauci et al promote a booster shot to meet the fully vaccinated designation. So, I guess “fully vaccinated” now becomes “fully, fully vaccinated.”

§ If a second booster comes on-line, as rumors suggest, we can be “foolly, fully, fully vaccinated.” Perhaps we could call this virus “COVID-1984.”